2.23.2006

SOMETHING SEEMS... DIFFERENT...

Some words we did not hear in Frank Jackson's first "State of the City" speech:
"Convention center"
"Casino"
"Lakefront"
Some words we did hear: "Cleveland Public Power rates".

... BUT NOT EVERYTHING

Not to detract from all those upstanding City Club members and "civic professionals", but wouldn't it be nice to have the Mayor's State of the City report delivered to an audience of regular Cleveland voters? I mean like, you know, people who can't come downtown for lunch because they only get half an hour and they're not allowed to leave the worksite?

Here's an idea for the City Club: Instead of a downtown hotel at noon, why not schedule next year's SotC for 7 pm at a neighborhood rec center, a big church hall or a high school gym? You could do it on the West Side one year, the East Side the next, and then maybe return downtown for election year.

Just think of all the new and different members you could recruit for the Citadel of Free Speech!

2.22.2006

AD HOMINEM, AD NAUSEAM

Last Friday, deep in an angry comment thread on a Daily Kos diary, a pseudonymous commenter calling herself "em dash" reproduced the record of a 2002 criminal conviction of a well-known Cleveland blogger. Later that day Kos himself called attention to "em dash"s comment in an open thread roundup, guaranteeing it would get lots of readers.

Then Monday, by a strange coincidence, "Heights Mom" blogger Cindy Zawadzki posted the same information.

I'm not including links to the sites because I have no interest in feeding their hit counts -- if you really want to know the details I'm sure you can find them on your own. "em dash"'s post was vitriolic comment #220 on an equally vitriolic diary entry from someone in Lorain, accusing Rep. Sherrod Brown of "swiftboating" Paul Hackett and of getting the blogger in question fired. The Heights Mom post was apparently a reaction to this (look at the comments).

In both cases, they printed the details of the blogger's four-year-old criminal record as an attack on his credibility in arguments about current events. Both said pretty explicitly: Don't believe anything this guy says now, don't listen to his opinions, because look! -- he pleaded guilty to a fifth-degree felony in 2002.

Back in high school debate club, we were taught to call this the "ad hominem fallacy". Wikipedia:
A (fallacious) ad hominem argument has the basic form:

1. A makes claim B;
2. there is something objectionable about A,
3. therefore claim B is false.

... Ad hominem is one of the best-known of the logical fallacies usually enumerated in introductory logic and critical thinking textbooks. Both the fallacy itself, and accusations of having committed it, are often brandished in actual discourse (see also Argument from fallacy). As a technique of rhetoric, it is powerful and used often, despite its lack of subtlety.
In politics, digging up old skeletons to discredit an opponent ad hominem has another name: Opposition research. It's something all campaigns do, and most try to hide. It's closely linked to another covert campaign practice -- anonymous sourcing. Voters see both practices as shady negative campaigning, but of course they often work; the old skeletons, when revealed, do take votes away from their owners, and the revealers often do manage to stay low-profile. So "oppo" -- not just about your old votes and speeches, but about your business failures and run-ins with the law -- is something you have to expect if you run for office.

But is it now something we have to expect if we write political blogs?

I want you to think long and hard about this. Think about what blogs add to politics -- unfettered, no-holds-barred debate that often involves violent disagreements. Think about the fact that many participants in this process reveal their identities, and many don't. Think about the fact that some participants (like Daily Kos) can spread "information" to thousands of desktops in a few seconds. Think about the number of emails and web ads you've seen, selling court and credit information (and now cellphone records) on anybody to anybody for a few dollars.

And if you live in a city like Cleveland, you might also consider the large number of your fellow citizens, notably African-American men, who are trying to overcome old felony records to build normal lives -- and the importance of getting them to participate fully in the democratic process.

Think about all that, and then ask yourself: Do you really want it to be considered tolerable behavior for a blogger, in the heat of anger or frustration with a political argument, to dig up and publish (anonymously or not) old dirt on an opponent that has no bearing on the argument, but simply serves to discredit the person making it? Do you really want ad hominem oppo research to migrate from the playbook of negative campaigning to the acceptable practices of online political debate?

Well, that's where "em dash", Kos and our own Heights Mom have tried to take us in the last few days. I don't want to go there. Do you?

2.20.2006

LOOKING FOR A REGION TO BELIEVE: Via MTB, here's a dead-on comment at jack/zen about the "regionalism issue" and the appearance of consensus:
One group suggests regionalism as a strategy for expanding the centralization of power; another suggests regionalism as a strategy for expanding the distribution of power.
I'd add:

One group defines regionalism as centralizing power now exercised by local communities (consolidation), while another sees it as a strategy to localize power now exercised by the state (devolution).

And:

One group sees regionalism as reducing and simplifying the leadership structures operating within a large geography, while another wants to expand the geography across which leaders of all kinds form new productive networks.
APPLAUSE

Congratulations to George, Tim, Gloria and some downstate folks for a terrific Meet The Bloggers with Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern. It happened Thursday in Columbus and I couldn't go, so I had a rare opportunity to hear an MTB for the first time online. The audio is so revealing that I'm not sure I'd even transcribe this one. Listen and see what I mean. (While the MTB gang was in Columbus they also interviewed Chillicothe mayor Joe Sulzer, who's running as a Democrat against GOP Congressman Robert Ney.)

And another round of applause for Gloria, for getting GOP gubernatorial candidate Jim Petro scheduled for his MTB session.

2.16.2006

NO DEMOCRACY REDUCTION IN 2006

So the Ohio Citizens League's Council reduction plan won't be on the ballot in May:
...[T]he Ohio Citizens League announced Tuesday that it was "idling" its efforts to reduce Cleveland's council from 21 to 11 members. Those efforts included collecting 31,000 signatures for a May ballot issue.

Edward F. Crawford, chief executive of Park Ohio Holdings Inc. and a league member, said Council President Martin J. Sweeney convinced the group he was committed to making council more effective and efficient and tackling other "good government" issues.

Sweeney said he told group members he believed the current ward-based system works well, and made no guarantees to change his mind. "There is no deal," he said. "I didn't commit to anything."

Crawford said the group's signatures are good for at least another year, and the league hasn't ruled out a ballot issue if it can't reach resolution with council members. Its plan would reduce Cleveland's council to seven members elected by ward and four elected citywide. All 21 members are now elected by ward.

Sweeney believes the charter review process is the best way to address whether council should be reduced. Under that process, a charter review commission could put a council-reduction plan before voters by 2008.
Score one for Marty Sweeney. Or maybe for Cleveland voters who weren't as eager to sign the OCL petition as Tony George of Westlake, Michael Gibbons of Fairview Park, and Peter Kirsanow of the Bush Civil Rights Commission and NLRB expected us to be... not to mention the League's newest leader-spokesman, Ed Crawford, another big GOP money guy who entertains Presidents at his 71-acre estate in Kirtland Hills and runs a business headquartered in Euclid.

(It may be of interest that Crawford's hometown of Kirtland Hills, with 597 residents living in 224 households, has a mayor and seven village council members -- i.e. a council/citizen ratio of 1 to 75, compared to Cleveland's ratio of about 1 to 23,000. Of course the Kirtland Hills councilmen are part-time, and may well be unpaid -- no one living there needs the money. Even so, having 1/75 of the residents on the village council seems excessive to me. I wonder if Crawford is circulating council reduction petitions there.)

2.14.2006

HACKETT: JUMPED, PUSHED, OR CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE?

I know I'm going to regret this, but I just have to ask: In what sense was Paul Hackett's decision to withdraw from the Senate primary race "forced" on him?
"This is an extremely disappointing decision that I feel has been forced on me," said Mr. Hackett, whose announcement comes two days before the state's filing deadline for candidates. He said he was outraged to learn that party leaders were calling his donors and asking them to stop giving and said he would not enter the Second District Congressional race.
The filing deadline was two days away. Mr. Hackett had his petition signatures in hand (I assume), more money in the bank than Barack Obama, and lots of supporters who believed him when he said he would go the distance. All he had to do was file and run. What exactly could Charles Schumer, Harry Reid or Chris Redfern have done to stop him?

So he was "pushed", "pressured" and "urged" to drop out. So there were "behind the scenes machinations... intended to hurt my campaign". So Brown backers Schumer and Reid called some donors. So what?

Is there more to this story? Blackmail? Hostages? A private ODP army taking up positions around the Hacketts' Indian Hill homestead?

Or has Hackett simply decided he doesn't like the odds, doesn't enjoy being an underdog, doesn't want to risk any more money, knows it's time to bail... but just can't resist that last righteous hit of martyrdom?
MARC DANN INTERVIEW POSTED AT MTB: As I was sitting down to this, my daughter the law student asked me to post a line she just got from her boyfriend:
Oh, is it lawyer hunting season already?
Well, no, but it's open season on the office of Ohio Attorney General. And with the Democratic primary suddenly "cleared" of competition for the U.S. Senate and Governor's nominations (sorry, Bryan, but facts are facts, even if we still have an MTB debate scheduled), there's just one hot race left: Subodh Chandra vs. Marc Dann for AG.

Lucky for you, the audio of Dann's interview with Meet The Bloggers was posted yesterday. And here are Chandra's transcript and audio. So get to work, class -- May 2 will be here before you know it.

2.13.2006

NEW YORK TIMES: HACKETT OUT OF SENATE RACE, BLAMES PARTY
Popular Ohio Democrat Drops Out of Race, and Perhaps Politics

By IAN URBINA
Published: February 14, 2006

Paul Hackett, an Iraq war veteran and popular Democratic candidate in Ohio's closely watched Senate contest, said yesterday that he was dropping out of the race and leaving politics altogether as a result of pressure from party leaders.

Mr. Hackett said Senators Charles E. Schumer of New York and Harry Reid of Nevada, the same party leaders who he said persuaded him last August to enter the Senate race, had pushed him to step aside so that Representative Sherrod Brown, a longtime member of Congress, could take on Senator Mike DeWine, the Republican incumbent.

Mr. Hackett staged a surprisingly strong Congressional run last year in an overwhelmingly Republican district and gained national prominence for his scathing criticism of the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq War. It was his performance in the Congressional race that led party leaders to recruit him for the Senate race.

But for the last two weeks, he said, state and national Democratic Party leaders have urged him to drop his Senate campaign and again run for Congress.

"This is an extremely disappointing decision that I feel has been forced on me," said Mr. Hackett, whose announcement comes two days before the state's filing deadline for candidates. He said he was outraged to learn that party leaders were calling his donors and asking them to stop giving and said he would not enter the Second District Congressional race.

"For me, this is a second betrayal," Mr. Hackett said. "First, my government misused and mismanaged the military in Iraq, and now my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."
Translation: I'm losing to Brown both in the polls and in fundraising, so it's time to wind the tape back to October, denounce those party bosses -- one more time! -- for backing the other guy, and break some things on my way out the door.

Very classy.

Fingerhut does it better.

P.S. Just a few hours ago Hotline was praising Hackett for a "deft withdrawal", predicting he would jump to the Ohio 2nd race against Jean Schmidt. Oops.

2.10.2006

PHO DOES BLACKWELL

Pho's Akron Pages has a really excellent analysis of Ken Blackwell's "blog entry" at the PD's "Open Mike" site. Here's a taste:
Reading Blackwell is something of a time warp. It’s 1979, all is bleak and all can be laid at the feet of tax-and-spend Democrats. We’re in a nationwide malaise and it’s all the fault of the other party.

But of course, this isn’t 1979. It is 2006, going on ten years since Democrats controlled anything in the state. The economy is moribund with no end in sight. We are in statewide malaise, all the fault of, apparently, Republicans who aren’t Republican enough. Given Blackwell’s professed love for Reagan, it’s not surprising that he’s running a Reagan-style campaign, but I didn’t realize until watching this race how much Reaganism required a foil.
And then he starts getting specific.

2.09.2006

ZELLER WILL JOIN CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS

I just got this via an email from Lou Tisler. It says it's for release today, so I guess it's public. (Yup, there's an afternoon story at cleveland.com.)
Date: February 9, 2006

Poverty Expert George Zeller Joins Community Solutions

(Cleveland, OH) George C. Zeller, noted researcher and poverty expert, joins The Center for Community Solutions in a move that will ensure his continued distribution of timely data and analysis, and enhance the research capacity of the organization.

"We are thrilled to have George continue his stellar career by joining our Research Team," said Gregory L. Brown, executive director and president of Community Solutions. "He brings with him a storehouse of knowledge and skill that will add to our ability to provide ongoing and up-to-date information on health and social issues facing Northeast Ohio.

"We appreciate the far-sightedness of the Board of Cuyahoga County Commissioners in making this relationship possible by providing the funding for George's work. They understand the importance of having accurate and timely data on which to base community decisions. And they recognize the advantages of a match between George's expertise and Community Solutions' mission and capacity."

Among the types of reports expected to be produced in the coming months are regular updates on trends in income, unemployment, poverty, the business cycle's impact on the labor market and job availability, sales tax collections, and more.

Zeller is best known as the creator of annual "Poverty Indicators" reports for Cuyahoga County neighborhoods and "Ohio Poverty Indicators" reports for Ohio counties. These publications are used by organizations across the county and the state for grantwriting, anti-poverty advocacy, program design, program evaluation, and academic research.

Zeller's experience includes responsibility in sociology programs at Ashland College (Ashland, OH), Wittenberg University (Springfield, OH), and Ohio State University (Columbus, OH). He is Chair of the Cuyahoga County Regional Transit Authority Citizens Advisory Board and a member of the American Sociological Association, the North Central Sociological Association, and the Cleveland Census Areas Statistical Committee of the U.S. Census Bureau. He served for many years on the Community Services Block Grant Information System Task Force at the National Association of Community Services Programs in Washington, D.C. Zeller was named one of the "87 Most Interesting People in Cleveland," by Cleveland Magazine in 1987.

Zeller may be reached at georgez@nacs.net.

The Center for Community Solutions is a private, independent, nonprofit organization focused on policy and system reform. It provides strategic leadership to improve targeted health and social conditions in Northeast Ohio through research, analysis, communication, and organization of community resources for action. Established in 1913, it is a United Way agency.
-30-
Congratulations, George!

(Reminder: Here's why he was available. And... Jackie Middleton still has her job.)
CHANDRA MTB TRANSCRIPT ON LINE... A transcript of the January 25 Meet The Bloggers interview with Ohio Attorney General candidate Subodh Chandra is now posted at the MTB site.

AND DANN INTERVIEWED: Chandra's rival for the nomination, State Senator Marc Dann, Met The Bloggers this afternoon. George, Tim, Gloria (and Tim), Jill and I asked questions; Jim ran the sound and Wendy lurked.

The Senator obviously came prepared for some bouncing around on Senate Bill 82, and he got it, but we covered lots of other ground too. Like Chandra's, a substantive MTB session. Keep an eye out for it here.

2.08.2006

ANOTHER REASON YOU DON'T WANT TO BE POOR IN OHIO

An email from Jeff Miller of Policy Matters:
Ohio is the only state in the country in which a worker earning the minimum wage and working all year for 35 hours a week will not qualify for unemployment compensation. Similarly, it is the only state in which a worker making $9 an hour working all year for 20 hours a week will not qualify. Those are two of the key findings of an analysis by the National Employment Law Project, released Wednesday, February 8 by Policy Matters Ohio, on how Ohio’s monetary eligibility standard for unemployment compensation compares with that of other states.

The report is available on the Policy Matters web site at http://www.policymattersohio.org/ucomp_ohio_excludes_2006_02.htm
FORAY INTO NEWSPRINT: MISSING LINKS

I've got a guest column in today's Free Times (Let ’em Eat Dial-Up: Too many Clevelanders lack even basic Internet access).

If you're here because you saw the URL at the bottom of the column, welcome.

The main thing I learned from writing this piece was that, whatever you think of print journalism, writing factual exposition without hyperlinks has become a pain in the butt.

Here are a few of the column's "missing links"...
Top 7 Intelligent Communities
Intel Worldwide Digital Community
One Cleveland
Digital Vision
Community wireless broadband initiatives:
aaaPhiladelphia, San Francisco, Houston, Minneapolis, others
Ubuntu Linux
CUTTING ROOM FLOOR: Also lost in the editing (about which I have no complaints... when you give an editor a thousand words for an 800-word space, something has to go) were more details about the survey of Cleveland residents' Internet access, including this chart:

More about the survey is here. If you're really into this, the whole thing can be found here, embedded in testimony I filed in a Public Utilities Commission case last July.

2.05.2006

OHIO COAL GEOGRAPHY

Today, I'd like to pass on a geography lesson I just learned. Let's start with a pop quiz:

1) Which of the Big Three Ohio cities (Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati) is closest to the majority of the state's working underground coal mines?

2) Which of the Big Three cities is closest to the seat of the state's biggest coal-producing county?

3) Which of the Big Three cities is the corporate headquarters of the company that mines over 40% of Ohio coal?

Okay, time's up. Put your pencils down and close your test booklets. The answers are:

Cleveland. Cleveland. And Cleveland.

Ohio's dominant coal-producing county is Belmont, on the Ohio River across from Wheeling. Its county seat, St. Clairsville, is 105 miles (as the crow flies) from downtown Cleveland. The distance to Columbus is 111 miles; to Cincinnati, 203 miles.

The state's two biggest underground mines, both in southern Belmont County, are the Powhatan No. 6 and the Century. Together they accounted for 10 million of the 23 million tons of coal mined in Ohio in 2004, the last reporting year. They also accounted for at least 40% of the state's 2,300 coal mining jobs. Both are owned by Murray Energy Corporation of Cleveland, whose sole shareholder is Robert E. Murray of Moreland Hills. (For more on Murray, see this Columbus Dispatch article.)

As for the first quiz question, take a look at the map below. I've divided the state into four quadrants with the lines meeting at the intersection of Knox, Licking and Delaware Counties (near Centerburg, the state's acknowledged geographic center). The black circles are Ohio's eight working underground coal mines. The northernmost five are near Uhrichsville, Cadiz, and Salineville -- all in the northeast quadrant, and all closer to Cleveland than to Columbus. The Powhatan and Century mines, near Alledonia in southern Belmont County, are a few miles closer to Columbus... but they're about as far northeast as you can get and still claim to be in "southern Ohio".


If you did well on the quiz, you're a lot better informed than I was a week ago. Like many others who think of ourselves as "northeast Ohioans", I had "coal" and "southern Ohio" in a single mental box -- as in "the southern Ohio coal industry", or "coal miners in southern Ohio".

But a few days ago, looking around for stuff to read on mine safety and clean coal issues, I googled my way to this page on the Ohio Department of Natural Resources website, with a link to the 2004 Report on Ohio Mineral Industries, along with this interactive map of mining operations.

So now I know better. I've learned that the state's coal industry is concentrated in what you might call "Mideast Ohio", starting at the southern edge of Northeast Ohio (Stark and Columbiana Counties), and running south along the first fifty miles of the Ohio River border (East Liverpool, Steubenville, Martin's Ferry) and counties just to the west. While this area is routinely included in maps of "Appalachian Ohio", its center of gravity isn't Athens or Portsmouth, but Wheeling and Pittsburgh.

I'm not sure what to make of this information, except that it would be a good idea to stop thinking about Ohio politics as a North/South proposition.

But here's one more interesting map exercise: In Cleveland, we're in the habit of defining the NEO region as a group of counties radiating outward from... well, us. Suppose we instead define the region by drawing a circle around a more central point, like, say, downtown Akron. Let's make the radius fifty miles -- an hour's drive -- which would take in Youngstown on the east, Painesville and Vermilion on the lakeshore, and Ashland to the southwest.



Inside that fifty mile radius, to the south and southeast, would be half of Ohio's eight underground coal mines, and more than 10% of the state's total coal production.

Does that make coal part of the NEO regional economy? If not, why not?